
Character: Harry Potter
Appears in: Harry Potter Series
Commonly Interpreted as: StraightBut Really: While he marries Ginny and has had relationships with other women, he never says he is only attracted to women.
He never says he isn’t bi, pan and/or queer. So he’s bi, pan and/or queer.
So because he never said “I LIKE GIRLS”(even though he is married to Ginny and has relationships with women) that makes home BI?
Hello, there. I was wondering when you’d show up.
This is stupid, let’s just assume he’s straight.why? why does he have to be straight
because it is demonstrated over and over in the series that he is in fact, straight. he is never shown being attracted to guys. if rowling wanted him to be bi she would have written that into the story. but she didn’t. so he’s not.
It isn’t, actually demonstrated that Harry is straight. It’s demonstrated that Harry is a.cis man who is sexually and romantically interested in cis women….and turns out there are plenty of bi folks who fit that description!
As for the argument that authorial intent should be the final say for interpretation of a character…well I can only guess that a show like Penny Dreadful has you seeing red! Talk about screwing with authorial intent! I can tell you for sure that Bram Stoker and Oscar Wilde never intended for their characters to appear in the same work. You must think Penny Dreadful quite sacrilegous.
And of course there’s the other problem that even when an author makes their intentions known that a character is bi…folks argue against it. Take Kieran Walker from In the Flesh…the show runner has explicitly stated Kieran is bi, and yet folks still ref r to him as gay because apparently there isn’t enough in the show itself for folks to believe Kieran is bi.
Or take, for example, how many folks argue against interpreting Dumbledore as gay because it wasn’t in the book…just something JK said later. My pojnt is, when it comes to interpreting characters as queer…folks take any excuse to deny that interpretation












